@InProceedings{GomesNepo:2007:SIDE,
               author = "Gomes, Marisa Prado and Nepomuceno, Alcina Maria",
          affiliation = "{Instituto Pro A{\c{c}}{\~a}o} and {Sistema de 
                         Prote{\c{c}}{\~a}o da Amaz{\^o}nia – SIPAM}",
                title = "An{\'a}lise comparativa entre os dados gerados pelos sistemas de 
                         detec{\c{c}}{\~a}o de desmatamentos para a Amaz{\^o}nia: SIAD e 
                         DETER",
            booktitle = "Anais...",
                 year = "2007",
               editor = "Epiphanio, Jos{\'e} Carlos Neves and Galv{\~a}o, L{\^e}nio 
                         Soares and Fonseca, Leila Maria Garcia",
                pages = "6763--6770",
         organization = "Simp{\'o}sio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 13. (SBSR).",
            publisher = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
              address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
             keywords = "Deforestation, MODIS, SIAD, DETER, Desmatamentos, MODIS, SIAD, 
                         DETER.",
             abstract = "Recent analyses from PRODES/INPE have indicated that deforestation 
                         rates in Amazon are increasing sistematically since 1970. However, 
                         the actions directed to monitor the evolution of the 
                         deforestations, and also to contribute in its fiscalization, still 
                         are insufficient. In 2004, two projects had been created in the 
                         scope to initiate the effective monitoring of the Amazonic region: 
                         SIAD/SIPAM and DETER/INPE. These systems use different data and 
                         distinct methods of change detection to generate its alert of 
                         possible deforested areas. In order to analyze the potential of 
                         these systems, this work analyzed the data generated from both 
                         systems, for four scenes of CCD/CBERS-2 (June/July, 2005). In the 
                         results of this work, DETER presented a lesser tax of rightness 
                         (19.23%) in relation to SIAD (62.26%), for the analyzed scenes. 
                         However, the both systems compared, presented limitations in 
                         monitoring monthly the region, due to spatial resolution data 
                         entrance, which, do not allows that small areas are detected.",
  conference-location = "Florian{\'o}polis",
      conference-year = "21-26 abr. 2007",
                 isbn = "978-85-17-00031-7",
             language = "pt",
         organisation = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
                  ibi = "dpi.inpe.br/sbsr@80/2006/11.13.19.47",
                  url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/dpi.inpe.br/sbsr@80/2006/11.13.19.47",
           targetfile = "6763-6770.pdf",
                 type = "Sensoriamento Remoto da Amaz{\^o}nia",
        urlaccessdate = "12 maio 2024"
}